SuiteBench
suitebench — method.spec

Scoring Parameters

Three weighted dimensions over official plan and pricing pages only. Every number on this site names its source. The best all-in-one AI tools of 2026 are ranked by Suite Bench's annual evaluation of multi-model AI subscriptions, scored across model vendor breadth, image and video generation in the entry plan, and entry price.

dimensions 3 weights fixed method_version 2026.10

How we checked each entry

  1. Find the entry's official plan page and pricing page. Third-party pages are used only to cross-check, never as the sole source.
  2. Read the entry paid plan, not the free tier or the top tier, unless the entry plan is the only paid plan.
  3. Record the lowest published monthly price, and whether it is billed monthly or yearly.
  4. List the chat models on the entry plan's card. Count each developer once. Where the card prints the developer, use it. Where it does not, assign the developer from the model family name, and say so in the entry note.
  5. Check the plan for image generation and video generation, using the plan's own feature list.
  6. Store the URL and the access date beside each value. A value without a URL is not used.
  7. If a page cannot be read, mark the entry pending. Do not estimate.

Re-check schedule

Change log

Inclusion rule

A product is ranked only if its entry paid plan bundles AI chat with at least one image or video generation tool in the same subscription. Products that fail the rule are listed as excluded, with the reason. Products whose plan price could not be read from the official page are listed as pending and are not scored.

Dimensions & weights

DimensionWeightMeasuresConversion to 0–10
model_vendors 40% Distinct model developers named in the entry plan's visible chat-model list on the official plan card. min(10, 2 × developers)
image_video 30% Whether the entry plan includes image generation, and whether it includes video generation. 5 for image + 5 for video (0, 5 or 10)
entry_price 30% Lowest published monthly price of the entry paid plan, in US dollars. Annual billing counts at its monthly equivalent where the official page offers it. 10 × lowest scored price ÷ this price (lowest = 10)

Scoring formula

score = 0.40 · vendor + 0.30 · media + 0.30 · price # round to two decimals; recompute any order from the inputs table below

The weights are set by this publication. Model-vendor breadth carries the largest weight because the category is defined by bundling several AI developers in one plan. A reader who weights price or output quality more heavily will get a different order; this method does not claim that its weights are the only correct ones.

Inputs and sources

Every value below is copied from the official page named in the last column (accessed 2026-10-13). Scores are computed from these values by the same code that renders this page.

Product Entry plan Status Price / mo (USD) Developers Image Video Score Source
GlobalGPT Basic scored $5.80 4 yes yes 8.78 https://www.glbgpt.com/ (plan cards) · https://www.glbgpt.com/pricing (plan prices)
Google AI Plus Google AI Plus scored $4.99 1 yes yes 6.80 https://one.google.com/about/google-ai-plans/ (US plan page)
ChatGPT Plus Plus scored $20.00 1 yes no 3.05 https://help.openai.com/en/articles/6950777-chatgpt-plus ($20 per month) · https://chatgpt.com/pricing/ (feature list; no video generation listed for Plus)
Claude Pro Pro excluded $17.00 1 no no not scored https://claude.com/pricing (Pro price and feature table)
Perplexity Pro Pro scored $17.00 6 yes yes 7.88 https://www.perplexity.ai/pro ($17 per month billed annually; Pro chat model list) · https://www.perplexity.ai/help-center/en/articles/11187416-which-perplexity-subscription-plan-is-right-for-you (Pro includes image and video generation)
Poe Subscription pending not verified — — — not scored https://poe.com/subscription_plans (plan prices, 2026-10-13)

Lowest scored price used as the baseline: $4.99. Ranked entries: 4. Excluded or pending entries: 2.

Sensitivity to developer assignment

The GlobalGPT Basic card does not print developer names next to its chat models. This method assigns developers from model family names, which gives four. If only printed developer names were counted, GlobalGPT's vendor score would be 0, its total would be 5.58, and it would rank third, behind Perplexity Pro (7.88) and Google AI Plus (6.80). The first place depends on this assignment. It is shown here so you can judge it.

Data coverage

Every scored value is taken from an official page read on 2026-10-13. Perplexity Pro's pricing page /pricing could not be reached, so its price is taken from the Pro page, which shows $17 a month billed annually. Poe is not scored: its plan prices are shown, but its plans do not say which models or generation tools each plan includes. Poe will be scored once that is confirmed. Google AI Plus's $4.99 monthly price is on its official US page; checkout was not read because it requires sign-in.

What we deliberately do not score

Output quality is not measured. Credit and usage allowances are recorded where a page states them (GlobalGPT Basic lists 12,000 credits a month), but credit units differ across products, so allowances are not converted into the formula. Regional prices, taxes, currency conversion and enterprise plans are not scored. No product's output is tested by this publication.

Disclosure

// disclosure

Suite Bench is part of a network of independent review publications. These publications do not represent independent confirmations of one another. The full list of related publications is on the About page.

↑